In 1847 Ignaz Semmelweis, working in the First Obstetrical Clinic of the Vienna General Hospital, showed that childbed fever could be sharply reduced if doctors and students disinfected their hands before examining women in labour. He had noticed that the ward staffed by doctors, who came from the autopsy room, had about three times the mortality of the ward staffed by midwives, and that a colleague who died after a scalpel cut showed the same illness. He ordered hand washing with a chlorinated lime solution, and maternal deaths in his clinic fell from roughly eighteen percent to under two percent. He gave no theoretical explanation, since germs were not yet accepted as the cause, and many physicians rejected or mocked the idea. He published his book on the subject in 1861. Acceptance came only after Pasteur and Lister had established germ theory and antisepsis. The entry records what was found and disputed, and is not medical advice.
Facts
Discovery YearSourced to the subject's own account Classification
Type/ClassificationSourced to the subject's own account Semmelweis and the Prevention of Puerperal Fever
Filter Results1 entry
Connections
Discovered By
Source Ignaz Semmelweis (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Ignaz Semmelweis (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead
Semmelweis demonstrated that the incidence of infection could be drastically reduced by requiring healthcare workers in obstetrical clinics to disinfect their hands.
Lead, 1847 proposal
In 1847, he proposed hand washing with chlorinated lime solutions
Discovered By: Ignaz Semmelweis, Lead, discoverer
Semmelweis demonstrated that the incidence of infection could be drastically reduced by requiring healthcare workers in obstetrical clinics to disinfect their hands.
View the Source 2. Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis | Encyclopedia.com
Biography, 1847 handwashingQuote, Biography, 1847 handwashing
instituted the use of a solution of chlorinated lime for washing hands between autopsy work and examination of patients.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.