Johannes Bohn (1640 to 1718) was a German physician, a native of Leipzig. He studied medicine at the universities of Leipzig and Jena and took his doctorate in 1665. In 1668 he was promoted to the anatomical chair at Leipzig, in 1690 he succeeded Gottfried Welsch as Stadtphysikus of the city, in 1691 he became city physician and professor of therapeutics, and in 1693 and 1694 he served as rector of the university. Bohn was known for pioneering work as a medical-legal officer in forensic medicine: he introduced the policy of thorough autopsies of the deceased and specialised in the investigation of lethal wounds. His treatise of 1689 examined the distinction between purposeful and accidental fatal wounds, and his Circulus anatomico physiologicus of 1710 gathered lectures on respiration, circulation, digestion and fetal development. He also did early research on the physiology of the circulatory system. Many of his writings were burned before his death, as his will required.
Facts
Connections
Specialist In
Source Johannes Bohn (source article)
Source Johannes Bohn (source article)
In the Other Atlases
Nationality
Also in Geography Atlas: the nationality of this subject.
Source Johannes Bohn (source article)Lead paragraphQuote, Lead paragraph
Johannes Bohn (20 July 1640 – 19 December 1718) was a German physician who was a native of Leipzig.
Sources
1. Johannes Bohn (source article)
Lead paragraph
Johannes Bohn (20 July 1640-19 December 1718) was a German physician who was a native of Leipzig.
In Group: Physiologists, Anatomists and Natural Historians of Medicine, Article body, third paragraph
He also did early research concerning the physiology of the circulatory system.
Specialist In: Anatomy, Lead paragraph or career section
In 1668 he was promoted to the anatomical chair at Leipzig
Specialist In: Forensic Pathology, Lead paragraph or career section [specialist-in]
He introduced the policy of thorough autopsies of the deceased, and specialized in the investigation of lethal wounds.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.