American biochemists Marshall Nirenberg and Heinrich Matthaei deciphered the first codon of the genetic code in 1961, showing in a cell-free system that an artificial RNA strand made up entirely of the base uracil directed the production of a protein containing only the amino acid phenylalanine, proof that a sequence of three RNA bases, a codon, specifies a single amino acid. Working separately in Severo Ochoa's laboratory, other researchers soon showed that a run of adenine bases coded for lysine and a run of cytosine bases for proline, and Indian-American chemist Har Gobind Khorana went on to synthesize defined RNA sequences that identified many of the genetic code's remaining codons, while American biochemist Robert Holley determined the structure of transfer RNA, the molecule that reads a codon and delivers the matching amino acid during protein synthesis. Nirenberg, working afterward with Philip Leder, eventually helped establish the meaning of 54 of the genetic code's 64 possible codons, and Khorana, Holley and Nirenberg shared the 1968 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for cracking the code by which genetic information directs the making of proteins.
Facts
Discovery Year Discovery Date DiscovererMarshall Nirenberg and J. Heinrich Matthaei 1 Classification
Type/ClassificationBasic Science Knowledge 1 Connections
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Genetic Code
Wikimedia FoundationHistory section, 1961 codon finding
Marshall Nirenberg and J. Heinrich Matthaei were the first to reveal the nature of a codon in 1961.
Lead: kind of discovery
Genetic code is a set of rules used by living cells to translate information encoded within genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences of nucleotide triplets or codons) into proteins.
View the Source 2. Wikipedia: Nirenberg and Matthaei Experiment
Article body, description of the poly-U runQuote, Article body, description of the poly-U run
At 3 am on May 27, 1961, Matthaei used phenylalanine as the "hot" amino acid.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.